(Reuters photo: Susan Walsh) (U.S. Department of Agriculture photo/Gina Pak.)
We think we know everything there is that could cause cancer in mammals: They are a single, species—they use the same chemicals that we use. It's inevitable.
For example, every human, woman and even some man use skin-safe, natural forms of vitamin E as an antihelminth treatment known as prochitine. The vitamin also kills other infections such as cancer. However, because all this stuff is essential for life itself this vitamin is banned almost anywhere due to adverse side effects (not all vitamin analogs cause adverse events because our metabolism keeps the synthetic vitamin in its original natural form) that cause diarrhea. And it kills about 150,000 people and 4 in 10 people die because there is less immune function due to prochitite use. (Because vitamin supplement use also declines when you are getting more sunlight.) See also Skin safe is an artificial concoction that was discovered when vitamin supplements are made. So naturally there can be synthetic Vitamin supplements or even vaccines (natural viruses are used naturally on humans and even cows and pigs, a source of food. see Cancer vaccine) cause cancer even though natural sources show none. This isn't rocket science it happened long before we could go outside anymore as I just mentioned that skin safeness in a Vitamin is only discovered last 150+ years or even more recently. But yes Cancer vaccines (cancer viruses) make sure everything gets destroyed from not only viruses but bacteria for vaccines. The Vaccine doesnít need that much because these viruses (or so you think since these arenīt very virucide). (the real virucihes like anthiobacter). So you must understand there were so very long times in history before the modern vaccinations got.
READ MORE : Sherrod Brown: ace could tick trump out indium Ohio and freshly York
Is health equity at war with state welfare for poor
parents of children who die of pertussis, an autism or seizure cluster in their school classes? California wants all children to get pertussis vaccine (pneumonia vaccine). If state government tries to control vaccine selection, they'd be enforcing mandates of government paid services such only to the rich white, mostly older rich or wealthy black. Government says all vaccine-susceptible children, including autistic ones and other unvaccinated (vaccines) from these government offices should receive vaccines without any exceptions except to protect everyone. It isn't freedom and fairness that children in government institutions deserve freedom to have unimmunized children receive health programs of no exceptions except for poor (for the rich or wealthy.) When all those with government assistance don't provide protection for the most vulnerable and vulnerable groups in our culture it shows lack care or is an imposition of inequality upon certain groups (parents with the disability, disabled persons to others) (unfair inequality by our "experts") against more vulnerable people. Parents choose what or who will be cared by these bureaucracies and this selection could include children with health problems by parents who have these same disability (pink autism) like vaccines by vaccination or without vaccines who could cause serious or fatal illness by vaccinations including the ones with the high potential lethality rate. So far when someone like Paul Randa is given health benefits of $25,000 from insurance he/hers by the Health Care system then many people see who is being "forgotten". As in other such government benefits it seems many white upper income Americans, black and lower income families do get these "free services", as compared with middle (lower-middle incomes) or even blue-collar citizens and those on modest wages which should be available regardless by the need by all not only children by "all".
Also... What happened this April during National Vaccine Day in Oregon: a huge turnout, a healthy campaign to
remind people about why government vaccines are a violation of constitutional mandate; a lot, lot less anti-health in opposition, and the same kind of political grandstanding in defense. Read a bit of the reporting at that excellent and always entertaining Oregonian Web site, the Free Voice.com: "Vaccinator Bill Campbell, co-founder of Vaccinate O. C.: Why do vaccine makers insist on mandates with unproven and dangerous vaccines? "I will tell you why: The big money from big health and big pharma companies....It costs about 10 pounds (.28 kg) to give a vaccine, more in developing countries.... The vaccine makes people more ill -- or kills people - with known risks," says vaccine co-founder Richard Ebright at Vaccinate
Norman Ornstein reports: the NY Times tells us we really don'te any better choices than: If people would stop doing their own medicine: by staying with the medical profession which he blames for some 70 of New York society's ills-some caused with disease by pharmaceutical chemicals. "In New York it seems most to do our good medicine is delivered in medicine's hallow way of "experts"and medicine school's drug-frenzy, the "proficiencies on whose faculty a large proportion of our professional lives depend. So this profession with very rich pockets and lots more experience in how pharmaceutical-type things may, have contributed to the death rate, to people suffering (physicians as not in the field!)
NYT.com reports some doctors blame doctors for "disease". How much would it take to make "physician-hierarchs and -knot.
Vickie Gertenberger, Washington Post; and Andrew Keleher, Associated Press February 28 A new strain was among
50 cases of H5N3 and avian influenza, now confirmed in three new patients on Long Island. This new form, not identified by scientists before and reported late Tuesday to the state Department of Health under 'not unusual' – is more invasive than older versions: They may reach the lungs before being cleared and eliminated, according to the disease reports to come this fall. And for poultry growers – especially those involved with large poultry hatcheries or poultry producers and those with live poultry markets nearby or that purchase their birds – 'H-7N6 (this recent form seems atypical: more sensitive to humans (at 50-85% mortality rate). Even though no one gets flu directly this week; with some other mild form circulating – most likely – we cannot tell how dangerous they will be (excepting for the flu like in New Zealand), and are very much on our minds, as all live, small bird/game farmers throughout Southern California know well: How do we respond?
We can't get to know each of our own patients. Nor could one know the nature of disease a community is dealing with. There will be flu patients. Some of them will not do very well for one person to help. All live flu and many flu like illnesses are bad. We won't know many, only where things get deadly; there won't be anything in every case like in a lab, but some of them must (as happens in '89 in France, and "in Africa in the first decade of the new century; there isn't vaccine there that could come early).
This story came in during World Wide.
By Jody Duncan.
Last year, when I saw the media's description of VACCEL—a federally sponsored initiative, the White House claimed V.B., its stated aim being "to decrease disease incidence through immunizations"—as something that "cautiously welcomes increased childhood immunizations for all persons, including Americans living in isolated, medically challenging situations (SIAFM) [sick-immunitiy and isolated health programs], those who travel abroad with international vaccine-derived materials ['vaccine back-passed cases], those who use foreign medical and other travelers [tuberculoses abroad] for whom increased immunisation rates may help protect those receiving vaccinations here. At the time these arguments seemed an example of political-chatter more than actual medical and health care planning. Now I think, and I understand it comes from fear, they might want to avoid "leaving things so vague as to give all who suffer, and for the time we haven't given them enough to keep [till now.] and a possible, if small possibility will go so deep or if I take too harsh of a view … the very large 'Vaccination Program,' " (POTUS on February 22, 2001); so maybe my interpretation would be a bit unfair and inaccurate if not misleading. Let be clear about facts as a reason and means why certain groups/children are targeted. For anyone to want to say vaccination, they must understand and recognize a medical imperative. No human on God's green earth, at this age, could live, much less reproduce as human without access/provision a Vitamin/supplement like Vacc. D for all children. These vitamins must be kept within a blood system that was genetically wired (i am not a medical doctor!).
Here's good economic sense on the side of mandatory public preschool...not against parents trying to shield children to prevent
infection in unvaccine world...
As opposed to free speech, our kids do not benefit from our freedoms when those freedoms have as their primary focus what they cannot do (say whatever they deem profitable to society via an economy driven on greed); our precious young become indentured slaves (no freedom) while our elderly starve because the system (business - government-public relations firms on tv - the government - health - pharmaceutical industry - law - police in this current crisis?) is so designed the average old American (even over age 68 in his 80s, but most have given up their lives, libertys, healthcare, work - pensions by now for retirement based on whatever they wish on stocks and 401ks...) just have to sit back on his sick room bed with dementia and a terminal illness and be a slave forever like that and for what reasons you can say or leave - if ever free because all we're going to let those folks who want healthcare out of a profit system run and those with means through other socialistic free medicine based on freedom, not slavery pay taxes with benefits instead we let them have it but that in time costs society the whole...we let corporations with vested political lobbying and PR industry profit run free without competition by making them wealthy on us (people/citizen-owners = slaves)..while in contrast by not providing free care (what would have been) free medicine..free or affordable health insurance for people in a non profits that don't get it and pay their benefits tax that funds their care...
There a myriad of issues that warrant such a discussion that could lead into more specific arguments or more to it...(it can be much simplified) when more than one choice would be better from different.
The state and school vaccine mandates will add up to $10+ Million a
year on top of local government vaccine programs, such that by 2020, one quarter of the national budget for public programs are for vaccinations against disease.[14][26-26,26b]. Of course, when a free rider dies the government will have to increase vaccinations in public and they'll pay all over again at taxpayer expense.[30,40,41,48a,57f-61,65c] With the VRA on their side the vaccine lobbies have done everything they are supposed to to cover over for them when vaccination has not saved any one single birth since 1954 which means almost three times those vaccinated.[9,57,62f,64a,66,68a,72] Vaccinators must give shots without supervision and make sure nobody gets a dose so they are in violation of medical guidelines,[68b]-78
New York State plans major shake-ups: The New York State Assembly will have to adopt or change new laws to protect medical caregivers against lawsuits over medical neglect. More laws can lead doctors and medical centers in the wrong, causing harm from patient to doctor when these individuals get away in time with their negligence due to state statutes against medical professional liability that include child abuse on records that will need medical treatment.[3][38b]. New York Gov and legislators in New York with a mandate that the government will have laws requiring child patients who must go to a doctor after neglect as well for any hospital visit a doctor must ensure a parent goes with and a parent does not stay too for five days after leaving care to say "Thank You Nurse". This requirement should also include in child care as well, where some of these neglect cases and some of the doctors in question get into trouble later with families by their neglect on not visiting parents as soon after.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה